User:Ned Scott/Page5

 This miscellaneous page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.

Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for Deletion page.

You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move this page (without knowing exactly what you are doing), or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, read the Guide to Deletion. Please consider notifying the [ author(s)] by placing &#123;&#123;subst:MFDWarning&#124;&#125;&#125; &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; on their talk page(s). ''
 * '' Maintenance use only: Subst either OR  into the page nominated for deletion. Then subst  into the newly created subpage. Finally, subst  into the [ log].

***ERROR *** ERROR *** ERROR *** ERROR *** STACK OVERFLOW EXCEPTION! RECURSION LIMIT REACHED! ***ERROR *** ERROR *** ERROR *** ERROR ***

====Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion==== Pointless! Cream (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Indeed.  Majorly  (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Overturn and list on DRV. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * So I curtailed my Walpoling activites, sallied forth, and infiltrated your place of purveyance to negotiate the vending of some cheesy comestibles. I want to buy some cheese. -- 12 N oo  n  2¢ 02:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Procedural question. Am I correct that deleting this page results in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion defaulting to a keep, therefore allowing the deletion of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, consequently causing Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion to default to keep, which in turn causes Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion to be deleted, permitting the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion to run its course, resulting in the removal of Miscellany for deletion?  If that's correct, can I propose moving this to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion and delete, causing Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion to stay, thereby purging Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, which causes to survive, consequently removing Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:User categories for discussion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion and allowing Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:User categories for discussion to do the much needed job of deleting User categories for discussion? --JayHenry (talk) 07:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Pain. Soxred93 | talk bot 19:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong PANIC!. --erachima formerly tjstrf 10:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong !vote. User:JayHenry's idea seems like the best overall, to cause the least possible confusion.  -- lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ZOMG strong counterpoint. What are you, a Nazi or something? The Evil Spartan (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as per Stack_errors_are_always_always_good Mazca (talk) 21:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)