Talk:Jocelyn Wildenstein

Biography assessment rating comment
WikiProject Biography Assessment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Discussion
(Previous discussion removed due to living persons policy.) -- Yamara 20:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Photograph needed
If this person's main claim to fame is her cosmetic surgery to make herself look more feline, then it is inconceivable why Wikipedia does not have a picture of this subject. This would seem like one of those circumstances where even an non-free image should be used to improve the encyclopedia. Eleven Special (talk) 19:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * It's good that you were blocked. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 13:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * "It's good that you were blocked" WTF does that mean? The user made a very reasonable request - this page absolutely needs a photograph.  Please keep snide remarks like that to yourself Ashley. 128.223.23.171 (talk) 20:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, Ashley sounds like a cunt to me. ^^ Seconded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.147.76.3 (talk) 00:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Who is Alec ?
Someone familiar with the subject, please re-write the last paragraph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.132.20.105 (talk) 00:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

so called references
I would like consensus to delete the current references and reformat the reference style used. The primary/first-listed reference is strongly slanted to the subject as victim and gives no sources or credentials. The second and fourth have no info or pic anymore (effectivly broken links) besides being tabloids and not proper references anyway. The third is only an image, let's find our own. The final is about the husband and is still the best one. Finally the style is suboptimal since it references info that is unlikely to be disputed or implies better sourcing by having lots of numbering. Anyone opposed to deleting all but the image and husband's obit for now?Sexy plant lover (talk) 06:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)